Difference between revisions of "Hydrothermal"

From Seasteading
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: [http://www.marshallsystem.com The Marshall System] is a proposal to tap into deep underwater hydrothermal vents to use the enormous amount of energy released.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[http://www.marshallsystem.com The Marshall System] is a proposal to tap into deep underwater hydrothermal vents to use the enormous amount of energy released.
+
[http://www.marshallsystem.com The Marshall System] The Marshall Hydrothermal System is a proposal to utilize underwater hydrothermal vents for energy and/or mineral resources. In one proposed version of the system, the vent would be capped off and the hydrothermal fluid directed to the sea surface using buoyant, insulated pipes. A floating platform or ship on the surface would then extract the heat out of the hydrothermal fluid and then use it for power generation.
 +
 
 +
In the other, closed loop system, a loop of pipe would go from a floating platform or ship on the surface, down to the ocean floor, next to or in the hydrothermal vent, and would return to the ship or platform. A heat exchanger outside of the pipe but within the vent would heat working fluid which would then be directed to the surface and used for power generation. The used working fluid would then be returned to the sea floor and be reheated.
 +
 
 +
Recoverable energy
 +
 
 +
Hydrothermal vents typically spew out superheated fluid as high as 407 degrees Celsius at velocities ranging from 1-5 m/s. The vent openings are anywhere from a couple inches to several meters.
 +
 
 +
Assuming a 3m opening and 3 m/s flow at 350 degrees Celsius, this is a flow of 21,205.73 L/sec which translates into 29,298.77 MW of power. The pressure is provided by the weight of seawater forcing itself into fissures which gets heated by the Earth's core. Therefore, this energy is completely renewable.
 +
 
 +
Technical challenges
 +
 
 +
The technical challenges of this proposal are numerous
 +
 
 +
For the open system: if a vent was successfully capped, would the hydrothermal fluid continue flowing? Would the heat rise so that it can be used at the top of the pipe?
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Economic challenges:
 +
 
 +
How much would either system cost? Would either be competitive with traditional methods of power generation?

Revision as of 19:46, 29 September 2009

The Marshall System The Marshall Hydrothermal System is a proposal to utilize underwater hydrothermal vents for energy and/or mineral resources. In one proposed version of the system, the vent would be capped off and the hydrothermal fluid directed to the sea surface using buoyant, insulated pipes. A floating platform or ship on the surface would then extract the heat out of the hydrothermal fluid and then use it for power generation.

In the other, closed loop system, a loop of pipe would go from a floating platform or ship on the surface, down to the ocean floor, next to or in the hydrothermal vent, and would return to the ship or platform. A heat exchanger outside of the pipe but within the vent would heat working fluid which would then be directed to the surface and used for power generation. The used working fluid would then be returned to the sea floor and be reheated.

Recoverable energy

Hydrothermal vents typically spew out superheated fluid as high as 407 degrees Celsius at velocities ranging from 1-5 m/s. The vent openings are anywhere from a couple inches to several meters.

Assuming a 3m opening and 3 m/s flow at 350 degrees Celsius, this is a flow of 21,205.73 L/sec which translates into 29,298.77 MW of power. The pressure is provided by the weight of seawater forcing itself into fissures which gets heated by the Earth's core. Therefore, this energy is completely renewable.

Technical challenges

The technical challenges of this proposal are numerous

For the open system: if a vent was successfully capped, would the hydrothermal fluid continue flowing? Would the heat rise so that it can be used at the top of the pipe?


Economic challenges:

How much would either system cost? Would either be competitive with traditional methods of power generation?