SparBuoy

From Seasteading
Revision as of 07:39, 31 August 2008 by Vincecate (talk | contribs) (Requirements Analysis)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

WARNING: This is an official page, which means that you shouldn't edit it unless you work for TSI or have been explicitly told you can. Feel free to comment on the talk page, link to it, or use categories that it mentions (unless they contain the world "Official").


Description

One cylindrical column. Height and diameter determined by desired size and comfort parameters.

Detail

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2153/2533681301_996f2cf479_t.jpg (from http://flickr.com/photos/27160491@N06/2533681301/)

  • Material issues - steel (expensive) concrete (can't handle tilting).
  • Constructed in disc-shaped sections - only need one set of molds per diameter, then make any length.
  • Not much topside weight, probably won't need User:Patri/HangingBallast or User:Patri/LightTopHull
  • If square-shaped, User:Patri/FractalTiling is possible, but it will cut off all the light except to the tiny top deck, which would make for an unpleasant habitation.

Requirements Analysis

  • Safety
    • It takes a licking and keeps on ticking.
    • Essentially unsinkable, since the airspace is fully enclosed, unless a porthole breaks.
    • Things on the top deck may get ripped off, though, so solar panels / wind turbines will need to be brought inside during big storms.
  • Comfort
    • May have significant response to large waves.
    • The smaller the spar (narrower, shorter), the large the response.
    • Heave plates will help via User:Patri/EntrainedSeawater
    • Not much solar area, so windows will be important.
    • The layout of "many small floors" is awkward, requires lots of stair climbing, not good for those with bad knees. An elevator with a counterweight and regenerative descent will help, at some cost in energy / nuisance.
  • Cost - We suspect this is the cheapest design. It's very simple.
  • Pretty - Moderate. Not lovely, not awful.
  • Modular
    • We should be able to combine by connecting (perhaps w/ small rubber spacers).
    • Possibly we can even do this w/ different sized spars.
    • Using stationkeeping to just float near each other is extremely modular
  • Cargo - Doesn't address this problem.
  • Free Floating - Definitely.
  • Scalable
    • Scales up or down in size (height, diameter).
  • Standards
  • Mobile - Definitely, although it will move slow because of the high wetted area. Could design in a teardrop shape to reduce drag.
  • Draft
    • It is not clear how we can make it shallow draft. Turn it sideways? Not good for your furniture!
    • Crazy idea: can be assembled/dissassembled in sections, like a stack of poker chips. For shallow waters, we pop one off at a time, turning it from a cylinder into a snake of small cylinders, with the lead one towing the rest. If it's a square, we can actually turn it into a horizontal rectangular prism without changing the orientation of any of the boxes - good for your furniture! Takes up a lot of space, though. Could do a combination - the lowest decks are just bulk storage, don't mind being turned sideways, top decks are rooms, those we disconnect and rearrange.