Difference between revisions of "Talk:ConceptualDesignProposal2009"

From Seasteading
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: "Spar Platforms have already been explored through ClubStead, single spars are too small, breakwaters are too big. " ClubStead is not a spar. FlipShip is a spar. FlipShip proves that si...)
 
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
"Spar Platforms have already been explored through ClubStead, single spars are too small, breakwaters are too big. "
+
The content on possible designs and which is best was moved to [[SpecificDesignProposals2009]], so the related discussion was moved there to.
  
ClubStead is not a spar.  FlipShip is a spar.  FlipShip proves that single spars are not too small (as do all the other oil spars). 
 
  
Why not see some models tested in waves before deciding that TSI will focus on "wave blankets"?
+
Why specify 50 people as a requirement?  I guess the [[seastead|seastead strategy]] you are using is the [[Floating City Seastead]]?  It seems to rule out other reasonable strategies.  Seems like you could ask for proposals in a more general way so that you did not specify the strategy ahead of time. [[User:Vincecate|Vincecate]] 15:06, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 
 
  -- Vince
 

Latest revision as of 15:06, 25 October 2009

The content on possible designs and which is best was moved to SpecificDesignProposals2009, so the related discussion was moved there to.


Why specify 50 people as a requirement? I guess the seastead strategy you are using is the Floating City Seastead? It seems to rule out other reasonable strategies. Seems like you could ask for proposals in a more general way so that you did not specify the strategy ahead of time. Vincecate 15:06, 25 October 2009 (UTC)