Difference between revisions of "User talk:Patri/LowCostSeasteadDesignProposal"
(New page: I think it is better to say "single family seastead" than "Low cost seastead". If we get a $1 million seastead that has better safety, stability, and room than a $4 million yacht we are ...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think it is better to say "single family seastead" than "Low cost seastead". If we get a $1 million seastead that has better safety, stability, and room than a $4 million yacht we are doing well. But not clear that $1 mil is "lost cost". [[User:Vincecate|Vincecate]] 05:57, 21 November 2008 (UTC) | I think it is better to say "single family seastead" than "Low cost seastead". If we get a $1 million seastead that has better safety, stability, and room than a $4 million yacht we are doing well. But not clear that $1 mil is "lost cost". [[User:Vincecate|Vincecate]] 05:57, 21 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Im not too sure about putting 'move itself at a few knots' under absolute. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If it can be implemented more efficiently than a tugboat could, then sure. But until we make that likely, i think a more general formulation like 'be movable at a few knots' would be better. | ||
Revision as of 11:57, 21 November 2008
I think it is better to say "single family seastead" than "Low cost seastead". If we get a $1 million seastead that has better safety, stability, and room than a $4 million yacht we are doing well. But not clear that $1 mil is "lost cost". Vincecate 05:57, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Im not too sure about putting 'move itself at a few knots' under absolute.
If it can be implemented more efficiently than a tugboat could, then sure. But until we make that likely, i think a more general formulation like 'be movable at a few knots' would be better.
