Difference between revisions of "User talk:Vincecate/GeodesicVessel"
(New page: I like the idea, but i'm not sure why the top needs to be round as well, would it make it a lot stronger? A flat top area would create a lot of useful area when the sea is calm. ~~~~) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I like the idea, but i'm not sure why the top needs to be round as well, would it make it a lot stronger? A flat top area would create a lot of useful area when the sea is calm. [[User:Joep|Joep]] 21:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC) | I like the idea, but i'm not sure why the top needs to be round as well, would it make it a lot stronger? A flat top area would create a lot of useful area when the sea is calm. [[User:Joep|Joep]] 21:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | What size is it expected to be ? If it is hit by a wave of wavelength roughly equal to its width, it risks capsizing and floating upside-down. It seems the ballhouse does not have this problem.--[[User:Jesrad|Jesrad]] 18:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:39, 20 September 2008
I like the idea, but i'm not sure why the top needs to be round as well, would it make it a lot stronger? A flat top area would create a lot of useful area when the sea is calm. Joep 21:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
What size is it expected to be ? If it is hit by a wave of wavelength roughly equal to its width, it risks capsizing and floating upside-down. It seems the ballhouse does not have this problem.--Jesrad 18:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC)