Difference between revisions of "HangingBallast"
(New page: Category:RequirementCostCategory:OfficialDesignPattern == Description == For single-spar designs which are gravitationally stable (C_g below C_b), rather than having the ballast a...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Category:RequirementCost]][[Category:OfficialDesignPattern]] | + | [[Category:RequirementCost]][[Category:OfficialDesignPattern]]{{Official}} |
== Description == | == Description == | ||
Revision as of 23:45, 1 June 2008
WARNING: This is an official page, which means that you shouldn't edit it unless you work for TSI or have been explicitly told you can. Feel free to comment on the talk page, link to it, or use categories that it mentions (unless they contain the world "Official").
Description
For single-spar designs which are gravitationally stable (C_g below C_b), rather than having the ballast at the bottom of the spar, we could hang it from the spar for additional leverage.
Detail
- This allows for much greater leverage of the ballast on the center of gravity, therefore allowing for less ballast and greater topside weight, without the additional cost of a long spar.
- Leads to stability issues when undeployed, however.
- It scares Patri that the seastead will be made unstable if ballast cables are severed.
- ? Is this needed/useful for metacentrically-stable designs, such as multi-column?
In this picture, imagine much longer cords for the hanging buoyancy:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2313/2534491378_50db429f2c.jpg
