Difference between revisions of "User:Vincecate/WaterWalker3"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | I like the idea of having pairs of buoys connected by a rope going through pulleys that DM8954 came up with and made the animation below. I would not bother with the thing to adjust the tension, but I would put computer controlled brakes on the ropes. | |
| − | I like the idea of having pairs of buoys connected by a rope going through pulleys that DM8954 came up with and made the animation below. | ||
[[Image:DualBuoyAnimation.gif]] | [[Image:DualBuoyAnimation.gif]] | ||
Revision as of 01:34, 7 March 2009
I like the idea of having pairs of buoys connected by a rope going through pulleys that DM8954 came up with and made the animation below. I would not bother with the thing to adjust the tension, but I would put computer controlled brakes on the ropes.
If I had a 4-leg WaterWalker with buoy pairs on opposite corners and computer controlled brake controlling how much the rope between each pair was allowed to move, I think I could have an amazingly stable platform with just 4 big buoys. In general I don't like active controls but we could have limits on how far the rope could go either way, and if the brake or computer broke it would just tip a certain amount. Could have redundant brakes and computers, and a manual brake.
An alternative is to have a hanging ballast that keeps the platform level and then no brakes or computers would be needed.
