Difference between revisions of "Talk:Civil Order Pact"

From Seasteading
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: John, I think there is a conflict between item 4 and 6. In 4 it should be made clear that once convicted of violating someone's rights your property could be seized for restitution and yo...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
John, I think there is a conflict between item 4 and 6.  In 4 it should be made clear that once convicted of violating someone's rights your property could be seized for restitution and your freedom can be limited based on the crime and the verdict of the jury.
+
John, I think there is a conflict between item 4 and 6.  In 4 it should be made clear that once convicted of violating someone's rights your property could be seized for restitution and your freedom can be limited based on the crime and the verdict of the jury.  I see the flow but I know some will take each item as being absolute and stand alone.

Revision as of 17:18, 13 June 2013

John, I think there is a conflict between item 4 and 6. In 4 it should be made clear that once convicted of violating someone's rights your property could be seized for restitution and your freedom can be limited based on the crime and the verdict of the jury. I see the flow but I know some will take each item as being absolute and stand alone.