Difference between revisions of "Talk:ConceptualDesignProposal2009"
(New page: "Spar Platforms have already been explored through ClubStead, single spars are too small, breakwaters are too big. " ClubStead is not a spar. FlipShip is a spar. FlipShip proves that si...) |
|||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | The content on possible designs and which is best was moved to [[SpecificDesignProposals2009]], so the related discussion was moved there to. | |
| − | |||
| − | Why | + | Why specify 50 people as a requirement? I guess the [[seastead|seastead strategy]] you are using is the [[Floating City Seastead]]? It seems to rule out other reasonable strategies. Seems like you could ask for proposals in a more general way so that you did not specify the strategy ahead of time. [[User:Vincecate|Vincecate]] 15:06, 25 October 2009 (UTC) |
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 15:06, 25 October 2009
The content on possible designs and which is best was moved to SpecificDesignProposals2009, so the related discussion was moved there to.
Why specify 50 people as a requirement? I guess the seastead strategy you are using is the Floating City Seastead? It seems to rule out other reasonable strategies. Seems like you could ask for proposals in a more general way so that you did not specify the strategy ahead of time. Vincecate 15:06, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
